The Indonesian home of Representatives has passed the Revised Special Autonomy undertaking (UU Otsus) for Papua and West Papua. The basis is to insert the loan and welfare of the people upon Earth of Cendrawasih through optimizing the special autonomy fund. This amendment (Law) reforms to augmented oversee go ahead in Papua and prioritizes the rights of OAP (Indigenous Papuans), said Deputy Chairman of Commission II of the Indonesian house of Representatives Junimart Girsang to Media Indonesia, Friday (16/7). According to him, honoring for OAP is more important in this law. There is even one article that specifically respects OAP, as in Article 68A.
Read also: Paskalis Kossay calls the Special Autonomy act out the Golden Bridge to a Prosperous and Independent Papua This article requires that in the context of synchronization, harmonization, evaluation, and coordination of the implementation of special autonomy and improvement in Papua, a special agency is formed which is directly answerable to the president, chaired by the vice president and consisting of ministers. domestic affairs, the head of Bappenas, the minister of finance and one representative from each province in Papua, he explained. The PDIP politician in addition to said additional articles with recognized OAPs rights. The combination of extra articles empowers OAP resources and conducts elections for the DPRK which are directly elected and tackle appointments for 1/4 of the seats for OAP from the sum number of seats in DPRK, he explained. Overall, the Papua Special Autonomy take action and no-one else has changes and additions, subsequent to 20 articles.
The second amendment made to work Number 21 of 2001 includes amendments to 18 articles and two articles. The additional articles, namely Article 6A and Article 68A, as a result that there are 20 articles. subsequently three articles from the governments proposal, namely Articles 1, 34, and 76 and 15 articles external the governments proposal, namely Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 17, 20, and an bank account of article 24 paragraph 1, articles 28, 36, 38, 56, 59, 68 and an version of article 75, he concluded. Meanwhile, a aficionado of the DPR from the PKB faction, Muhammad Fauzan Nurhuda Yusro, explained that the substance of the amendment to the Special Autonomy feint was more just about extension handing out over the implementation of the special autonomy fund. In particular, the Chapter upon Supervision, particularly Article 67, is not amended but is strengthened through Article 34 paragraph (14). Later on, the dispensation of the supervision of revenues in the framework of special autonomy as referred to in paragraph (3) letter b number 4 and number 5, letter e, and letter f will be carried out in a coordinated manner as soon as their respective authorities by ministries, non-ministerial processing institutions, regional governments, DPR, DPD, the supreme Audit Agency, and give leave to enter universities, he explained. A more detailed mechanism upon augmentation supervision, he said, would be regulated in a government Regulation (PP), and its preparation was then consulted gone the DPR through the commission in charge.
The change, he continued, was based on the review results from the previous Otsus. That the governance of the special autonomy budget revenue raises many problems, including deficiency of transparency, accountability, and dearth of targeting. So the special autonomy funds are not enjoyed by the entire Papuan community, he said. He emphasized that the DPR and the processing want Papua to be more modern to catch up. So united to the unfriendliness article, the DPR assesses from existing experience that the progress makes the region more enlightened in developing its region. see at West Papua now progressing, right, he explained. According to him, to revere the dignity and worth and guarantee the aspirations and allegation of the indigenous Papuan people, this discharge duty reorganizes the affirmative policy in the Papuan Peoples Assembly (MRP) and the Papuan Peoples Assembly (MR Representative Council (DPRP). As regulated in Article 6, there is an other norm to draw attention to that DPRP members arrive from members elected in general elections like statutory provisions and appointed from Papuan indigenous (OAP) elements, he explained.
The appointed DPRP must not come from a diplomatic party and accommodate 30% of its women. The members of the DPRP who are appointed are or one-fourth of the total members of the DPRP who are elected in the general election gone the provisions of the legislation. The term of office is five years and ends simultaneously with the term of office of the elected DPRP members. Then, vis–vis further profound provisions with reference to the appointed members of the DPRP, it is regulated in the PP. The allegation of the house of Representatives link applies to the DPRP and applies to the district/city or DPRK level. The union is the similar as that of the DPRP. Only, in the normalization of this bill, it needs to be regulated in a cut off article. Therefore, the PKB Faction definitely in the same way as the accessory by inserting Article 6A to fiddle with the DPRK, he concluded.
In the event you loved this article and you would want to receive much more information concerning papua barat i implore you to visit our own website.